Judgement of this video: Click Here! IMMIGRATION — Refugee status — Procedure Presumption of state protection — Gender Guidelines — Refugee claimant was citizen of Botswana who alleged fear of persecution by her four half brothers as result of family property dispute.

Judgement of this video: Click Here! Refugee status — Procedure Procedural fairness — Refugee claimant was citizen of Afghanistan who applied for refugee protection on basis of her fear of domestic abuse by husband.

Judgement of this video: Click Here! IMMIGRATION — Refugee status — Procedure Well-founded fear of persecution — Internal flight alternative — Refugee claimants were elderly couple of Tatar nationality and Islamic faith who alleged fear persecution in Russia at hands of skinheads and other nationalists.

Judgement of this video: Click Here! IMMIGRATION — Refugee status — Requirements Applicants were citizens of India and members of Sikh minority — Their refugee protection claim stemmed from family dispute over lands that were owned by male applicant’s grandfather, who passed away in 2000

Judgement of this video: Click Here! IMMIGRATION — Refugee status — Requirements Applicant was citizen of Pakistan who feared returning there because he had been persecuted for being of Ahmadi faith — His daughter in Canada, with whom applicant was living, remained steadfastly opposed to Ahmadi faith and his conversion was hidden from her until he returned to Pakistan

Judgement of this video: Click Here! Refugee status — Procedure Duty owed by board to self represented claimants — Refugee claimants were self represented — Board denied claim on grounds that claimants had not rebutted presumption of state protection and internal flight alternatives (“IFAs”) existed for claimants.

Hakobyan v. Canada This is an IMMIGRATION case, — Visitors — Employment authorizations   Case law is not meant for people interested to apply for immigration to Canada, but may be used by those who feel the system is not fair, to gain an understanding of the recourse available in Canada. Content for this video is sourced from information distributed …

Counsel for the Applicants proposed three questions for certification:
 1. Within the Refugee Appeal Division [RAD]’s statutory framework where the appeal proceeds on the basis of the Refugee Protection Division [RPD] record of the proceedings, what is the level of deference, if any, owed by the RAD to the RPD’s findings of fact or mixed fact and law? Page: 4
 …

Here is another IMMIGRATION case, Bermudez v. Canada — Selection and admission — General — Cessation of permanent resident status — Case law is not meant for people interested to apply for immigration to Canada, but may be used by those who feel the system is not fair, to gain an understanding of the recourse available in Canada. Content for this …

Here is another IMMIGRATION case Dolma v. Canada about Nationality, — Refugee status — Requirements — Effective nationality — Case law is not meant for people interested to apply for immigration to Canada, but may be used by those who feel the system is not fair, to gain an understanding of the recourse available in Canada. Content for this video is …