Canada Immigration Case-law Canada v Kulasekaram, IMMIGRATION — Refugee status — Procedure by Joy Stephen, Polinsys

January 25, 2016

IMMIGRATION — Refugee status — Procedure

Judgement for this Case: Click here!

Refugee Protection Division (“RPD”) denied applicant refugee protection — RPD noted problems with applicant’s story and absence of corroborating evidence that he was being sought by authorities in country of origin — RPD did not believe applicant was wanted by government security forces and did not believe evidence of his subjective or objective fear — Applicant sought judicial review asserting RPD engaged in flawed credibility assessment — Application dismissed — Decision was reasonable — It was within RPD’s jurisdiction to give varying weight to relevant evidentiary element in reasonable objective manner — RPD conducted independent analysis of credibility and assessed objective and subjective elements of claim — RPD did not inappropriately conflate credibility concerns in respect of past incidents of alleged persecution with credibility of sur place basis of claim — There was no inadequacy in reasons

Nov 22, 2016

Canada Immigration Caselaw, Yu v. Canada, IMMIGRATION — Judicial review — General

Judgement of this Case, Click Here! IMMIGRATION — Judicial review — General — Applicant was 26-year-old male born in China who became permanent resident in August...

Nov 22, 2016

Canada Immigration Caselaw Ullah v. Canada, IMMIGRATION — Selection and admission — Sponsorship

Judgement of this Case, Click Here! IMMIGRATION — Selection and admission — Sponsorship — Claimant’s application for permanent residence was dismissed — Visa officer found that...

Nov 22, 2016

Canada Immigration Caselaw, Singh v. Canada, IMMIGRATION — Selection and admission — Permanent residence applications

Judgement of this Case, Click Here! IMMIGRATION — Selection and admission — Permanent residence applications — Foreign national was citizen of UK who applied for permanent...

Nov 22, 2016

Canada Immigration Caselaw, Gennai v. Canada, IMMIGRATION — Selection and admission — Permanent residence applications

Judgement of this Case Click Here! IMMIGRATION — Selection and admission — Permanent residence applications — In October 2014, applicant applied for permanent residence in Canada...

Write to us

First name So we know who we are speaking to, and so our reply reaches you by name. Email So we can reply. We will send one message to confirm the address is yours, and nothing else until you click it. Phone, with country code So we can reach you on WhatsApp if you would like us to — only if you choose it. We never cold-call. Country you live in now Canadian immigration is decided partly by where you are now, and it tells us which office and which timelines apply to you. Province or state Several provinces run their own programmes with their own, often easier, requirements. Telling us where you are is how we find the ones open to you. Nationality (your passport) Your passport decides visa requirements, processing times and some programme eligibility. It is the single fact that changes the most.

We never sell your details. We never cold-call. One email, then nothing until you click.

I agree that Polinsys may contact me about this enquiry.

Enquiries are answered under Joy Stephen, RCIC (CICC licence R419719), a Canadian authorized representative.

Canada Immigration Case-law Canada v Kulasekaram, IMMIGRATION — Refugee status — Procedure by Joy Stephen, Polinsys

Related

Canada Immigration Caselaw, Yu v. Canada, IMMIGRATION — Judicial review — General

Canada Immigration Caselaw Ullah v. Canada, IMMIGRATION — Selection and admission — Sponsorship

Canada Immigration Caselaw, Singh v. Canada, IMMIGRATION — Selection and admission — Permanent residence applications

Canada Immigration Caselaw, Gennai v. Canada, IMMIGRATION — Selection and admission — Permanent residence applications

Write to us